Sheikh Professor Abdul Hadi Palazzi's
"Middle East Quarterly" book review (Summer, 2002)
falsified by Dr. Daniel Pipes, Middle East Forum director
and "Middle East Quarterly" publisher and review editor.

When Maulana Sheikh protests, Dr. Pipes insults him.

This page is a public record in order to defend our Sheikh's reputation.

"The text of the book review of 'Children of Abraham: An Introduction to Islam for Jews' by Khalid Duran with Abdelwahab Hechiche, which appeared on page 82 of the Summer 2002 issue of the Middle East Quarterly, although bearing the signature of Abdul Hadi Palazzi, was altered without the endorsement of the author and in a way which changes the judgment of the author about the book to the opposite of that intended".

"Sheikh Professor Abdul Hadi Palazzi never wrote that the book is "excellent", and never claimed that "There have even been threats against the author". On the contrary, Sheikh Professor Palazzi sees in the book a "deliberate intent to be provocative" and does not believe in the existence of death threats against the author".


"
Please find below the text of the authentic book review written by Sheikh Palazzi..."

 

JERUSALEM, Israel, 25 Tammuz, 5763 - July 25, 2003 - 25 Jumad Awal, 1424
Root & Branch Information Service rb@rb.org.il
http://www.rb.org.il

        
1 - MESSAGE FROM SHEIKH PROFESSOR ABDUL HADI PALAZZI
      TO "MIDDLE EAST QUARTERLY" EDITOR DR. MARTIN KRAMER
      (MONDAY, JUNE 24, 2002)


To: Dr. Martin Kramer
Editor
Middle East Quarterly
kramerm@post.tau.ac.il
MEQ@MEForum.org

Rome, June 24, 2002


Dear Dr. Kramer,

The Middle East Forum recently sent me a courtesy copy of the current issue of The Middle East Quarterly (Summer 2002, Volume IX, number 3).

I was shocked when I saw it.

On page 82 there is a book review of "Children of Abraham" by Khalid Duran.

Notwithstanding the declaration "The opinions expressed in the articles and reviews in this journal are those of the authors alone", this book review is signed with my name, but it is not the text of the book review which I actually wrote and does not express my opinions.

On July 6, 2001, Daniel Pipes asked me to review Khalid Duran's book.

On August 23, 2001, I sent Mr. Pipes my book review via email.

The text of my review of Khalid Duran's book which was published in your quarterly was manipulated to the point of attributing to me the opposite of what I wrote and of what I think about the book.

My judgment about Khalid Duran's book was negative.

Someone deleted part of my text and added words that I never wrote in order to change my judgment from negative into positive.

As Mr. Pipes asked me to review Khalid Duran's book, and as the review attributed to me appears in a section entitled "Brief Reviews by Daniel Pipes", I am inclined to think that Mr. Pipes is responsible for the manipulation of my review.

Here is the text published with my name in the Summer, 2002, Middle East Quarterly:
 

***[BEGIN TEXT/FALSIFIED BOOK REVIEW]***
 

Children of Abraham: An Introduction to Islam for Jews
by Khalid Duran with Abdelwahab Hechiche
Hoboken, N.J.: Ktav Publishing House, 2001.
354 pages, $19.95, paper


"Conceived as a response to requests by Jews wanting to learn more about Islam directly from Muslims, Duran's book offers an excellent opportunity to be informed about the belief, the practice, and the culture of Islam by a scholar who, apart from being a Muslim, is also especially involved in interfaith dialogue and in the analysis of the contemporary Islamic world".

"Being published by a Jewish organization and paired with a companion book that introduces Judaism to Muslims, Duran's study aims to promote and stimulate inter-Abrahamic dialogue. It underlines the theological and moral resemblance that exists between Islam and Judaism: it also investigates the factors that caused the relations between the two religions to be sometimes shaped by peaceful coexistence, mutual influences, and emulation, and at other times by misunderstandings, rivalries, and conflicts".

"Given that promoting understanding between Jews and Muslims is an aim of the book, it was to be expected that the militant Islamic organizations in the United States -- branches of a network that promotes anti-Jewish hatred as an essential aspect of their agenda -- have been unhappy about its publication and have spared no effort to slander the author and to alienate possible Muslim readers from the book. There have even been threats against the author".

Abdul Hadi Palazzi


***[END TEXT/FALSIFIED BOOK REVIEW]***
 

Here is the real text I actually wrote and sent to Mr. Pipes:


***[BEGIN TEXT/ORIGINAL BOOK REVIEW]***


Children of Abraham:
An Introduction to Islam for Jews
by Khalid Duran with Abdelwahab Hechiche
[No indication about the place of publication]
The Harriet and Robert Heilbrunn Institute for International Interreligious Understanding
American Jewish Committee, 2001
354 pages. [no indication of price]


This book is conceived as a response to the requests of those Jews who want to learn Islam directly from Muslims, and gives them the opportunity to be informed about the belief, the practice and the culture of Islam by a scholar who, apart from being a Muslim, is also especially involved in interfaith dialogue and in the analysis of the features of the contemporary Islamic world.

Being published by a Jewish editor, and conceived as the companion of another book which introduces Judaism to the Muslim public (Children of Abraham:  An Introduction to Judaism for Muslims, The Harriet and Robert Heilbrunn Institute for International Interreligious Understanding of the American Jewish Committee, 2001), Duran's book aims to play an important role in promoting and stimulating inter-Abrahamitic dialogue.

It underlines the theological and moral resemblance which exist between Islam and Judaism, and also investigates the factors which caused the relations between the two religions to be in some cases shaped by peaceful coexistence, mutual influences and emulation, and in some others by misunderstandings, rivalries and conflicts.

Since promoting understanding between Jews and Muslims is among the declared finalities of the book, it is quite natural that the militant Islamist organizations of America -- branches of a Network which considers promoting anti-Jewish hatred as an essential aspect of their agenda -- have been disappointed by its publication, and have spared no effort to slander the author and to alienate possible Muslim readers from the book, even before its publication.

One must admit that, notwithstanding the praiseworthy intentions of the Author, the book nevertheless contains some theological and historical mistakes which sensitively reduce the degree of its reliability and its impact on the Muslim public in general.

Moreover, in some cases Duran makes affirmations which it is hard not to interpret as a deliberate intent to be provocative, and to cause a negative reaction in the overwhelming majority of the traditional Muslim readers, even of those who are not Islamist at all.

This risks to some extent to avert from the dialogue one of the parts which he seem intentioned to involve, and practically can give the Islamists an opportunity to formulate some critics which are acceptable even for Sunni Muslims who dislike the policy of the Network and oppose its totalitarian project.


Abdul Hadi Palazzi


***[END TEXT/ORIGINAL BOOK REVIEW]***
 

Obviously, as a publisher, if Pipes disagrees with my judgment of Duran's book, he can simply refuse to publish my review, and eventually ask someone else to write a review of the same book.

Neither Pipes nor anyone else has any right to publish in my name their own falsifications, or to make me define as "excellent" a book which I on the contrary consider as containing "theological and historical mistakes which sensitively reduce the degree of its reliability" and as expressing a "deliberate intent of being provocative".

Moreover, no one can attribute to me the declaration that "there have even been threats against the author" (a sentence that I never wrote), when on the contrary I believe that such alleged "threats" are a forgery of the author in order to promote the sale of his book.

I must defend my reputation against anyone who attempts to attribute to me statements I never made, especially when by doing so my reputation as a Muslim cleric and as a scholar is seriously injured.

No one has the right to damage my reputation by claiming that I consider as "excellent" a book which in some point manifests the deliberate intention of offending the religious feelings of the Muslims, and which contain theological and historical mistakes that not even a teenager on the junior-high level in a Muslim school would ever make.

If Pipes considers Duran's book to be "excellent", he has no right to attribute that judgment to me.

If Pipes wishes to circulate fictions about "death threats" against this author, he is welcome to do so in his own name, not in mine.

I am working hard to promote Jewish-Muslim dialogue and understanding, and I will not tolerate that someone attributes to me a supposed positive evaluation of a book which I consider as a slap in the face of those who promote authentic understanding between Jews and Muslims.

I sincerely hope that Pipes's unethical and unprofessional behavior toward myself will be condemned by you and the staff of your distinguished quarterly.

I am formally asking you to honor the truth and to publish in the next issue of the Middle East Quarterly the following disclaimer:


***[TEXT OF DISCLAIMER]***
 

"The text of the book review of 'Children of Abraham:  An Introduction to Islam for Jews' by Khalid Duran with Abdelwahab Hechiche, which appeared on page 82 of the Summer 2002 issue of the Middle East Quarterly, although bearing the signature of Abdul Hadi Palazzi, was altered without the endorsement of the author and in a way which changes the judgment of the author about the book to the opposite of that intended".

"Sheikh Professor Abdul Hadi Palazzi never wrote that the book is "excellent", and never claimed that "There have even been threats against the author".  On the contrary, Sheikh Professor Palazzi sees in the book a "deliberate intent to be provocative" and does not believe in the existence of death threats against the author".

"Please find below the text of the authentic book review written by Sheikh Palazzi...(text of original review)".

Shaykh Prof. Abdul Hadi Palazzi
Director
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cultural Institute of the Italian Islamic Community
http://www.islam.italy.too.it
mailto:islam.inst@flashnet.it

 



2 -    MESSAGE FROM "MIDDLE EAST QUARTERLY" EDITOR DR. MARTIN KRAMER
        TO SHEIKH PROFESSOR ABDUL HADI PALAZZI
        (MONDAY, JUNE 24, 2002)


From: "Martin Kramer" <meqeditor@hotmail.com>
To: islam.inst@flashnet.it
Cc: mideastq@aol.com
Subject: Your letter
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:54:13 -0400
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jun 2002 20:54:13.0324 (UTC)

Dear Sheikh Prof. Palazzi,

Many thanks for your message. Of course, I am distressed to learn that you are dissatisfied with your review as it appeared in MEQ.

Your presumption is correct: Dr. Pipes is indeed the book review editor of MEQ. As he is also the publisher of the journal,

I have referred your concerns to him. Whatever understanding the two of you may reach will be acceptable to me.

Sincerely,


Martin Kramer

_______________________________
MARTIN KRAMER, Editor
MIDDLE EAST QUARTERLY
Middle East Forum
1500 Walnut Street
Suite 1050
Philadelphia, PA 19102-3523
----------------------------------------------
Voice Mail: (206) 984-1309
Fax: (419) 781-5213
E-mail: meqeditor@hotmail.com
Website: www.mequarterly.org

 



3 -    MESSAGE FROM DR. DANIEL PIPES, MIDDLE EAST FORUM DIRECTOR
        AND "MIDDLE EAST QUARTERLY" PUBLISHER AND REVIEW EDITOR,
        TO "MIDDLE EAST QUARTERLY" EDITOR DR. MARTIN KRAMER,
        ALSO SENT TO SHEIKH PROFESSOR ABDUL HADI PALAZZI,
        IN WHICH DR. PIPES REFERS TO SHEIKH PROFESSOR PALAZZI
        AS A "FRUITCAKE"
        (MONDAY, JUNE 24, 2002)


At 12.18 Monday 24/06/02 -0400, Daniel Pipes <Meqmef@aol.com> wrote:

"I was shocked when I saw it."

I suggest ou tell him you had nothing at all to do with the review and that Palazzi contact me if he wants to discuss it further.

What a fruitcake.

DP

 



4 -    MESSAGE FROM SHEIKH PROFESSOR PALAZZI
        TO DR. DANIEL PIPES, MIDDLE EAST FORUM DIRECTOR
        AND "MIDDLE EAST QUARTERLY" PUBLISHER AND REVIEW EDITOR,
        REGARDING REFERENCE BY DR. PIPES TO SHEIKH PROFESSOR PALAZZI
        AS A "FRUITCAKE"
        (MONDAY, JUNE 24, 2002)


Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 19:22:01 +0200
From: Cultural Institute of the Italian Islamic Community
<islam.inst@flashnet.it>
Subject: Re: LETTER OF PROTEST TO DR. MARTIN KRAMER
X-Sender: fn034463@mbox1.flashnet.it
To: kramerm@post.tau.ac.il, MEQ@MEForum.org, Meqmef@aol.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
X-Loop-Detect: 1


Dear DP,

Not only you had the nerve to rewrite my book review to say the opposite of what I wrote, but now you dare to call me a fruitcake when I object to it.

I expect the Middle East Quarterly to print the requested disclaimer and correction.


Shaykh Prof. Abdul Hadi Palazzi
Director
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cultural Institute of the Italian Islamic Community
http://www.islam.italy.too.it
mailto:islam.inst@flashnet.it

 



5 -    MESSAGE FROM SHEIKH PROFESSOR PALAZZI
        TO "MIDDLE EAST QUARTERLY" EDITOR DR. MARTIN KRAMER
        (TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 2002)


Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 20:16:54 +0200
From: Cultural Institute of the Italian Islamic Community
 <islam.inst@flashnet.it>
Subject: Re: Your letter
X-Sender: fn034463@mbox1.flashnet.it
To: Martin Kramer <meqeditor@hotmail.com>
Cc: mideastq@aol.com, Meqmef@aol.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
X-Loop-Detect: 1


Dear Dr. Kramer,

I am disappointed to see that - instead of being distressed to learn that Pipes manipulated my book review to the point of attributing to me the opposite of what I wrote - you are only distressed to learn that I am dissatisfied with Pipes's falsification and abuse of my name.

Since you are the editor of the Middle East Quarterly, it is indeed surprising that you are not distressed to learnt that your review publishes falsifications, but are only distressed that the victim of those falsifications does protest.

I have no intention to look for agreements with a dishonest man who supposes to have the right to manipulate my writings as he deems better, and who dares to call me a fruitcake when I protest for his unqualifiable behavior.

Since you are not in a position to rectify an abuse committed on a review of which you are the editor (legally responsible for its contents), I will look for more effective means in order to defend my reputation.

Best greetings,



Shaykh Prof. Abdul Hadi Palazzi
Director
-------------------------------------------------
Cultural Institute of the Italian Islamic Community
http://www.islam.italy.too.it
mailto:islam.inst@flashnet.it
 


Home Page